State the approach and researcher role
Explain the question, sampling strategy, collection method and analytical perspective. Describe the researcher’s relationship to the setting where relevant. Do not combine terms from incompatible approaches simply because they sound rigorous.
Prepare a usable source record
Check transcripts or documents, apply agreed de-identification and retain a controlled original. Record contextual information needed for interpretation. Ensure that use of extracts and sharing of files are consistent with consent and project agreements.
Document interpretive decisions
Keep memos explaining how codes, categories or themes changed. Where several researchers are involved, describe their roles and how different readings were discussed. Software can help organize material, but the analytical reasoning must be explained by the researchers.
Write findings that the evidence supports
Use well-chosen extracts with enough context to show their relevance. Include variation and contradictory material where it affects interpretation. Avoid presenting a theme as a population frequency unless the design and analysis support that claim.